| « Racism of the Arabs | Aspects of Genesis » |
Link: http://fallbackbelmont.blogspot.com/2007/08/economic-geneva.html
I should, of course, have seen it earlier, but it appears that the intellectually flabby ethics of this age DID have an effect on me. However, sometimes it takes a truly blatant move like this to shatter the careful framing that keeps the victim in the scam.
Suddenly, I realized that I don't HAVE to have a philosophy that patently identifies, even to fools, ALL forms of evil. All I need is to be able to positively, without error, identify AN evil.
The evil in the above link is that those who were not involved in a crime or evil act are being made to pay, against their wills, the penalty that should be imposed on those who did do the crime or evil act.
It is the flip side of the Roman arrangement of the process of justice that allows a few guilty to escape punishment so that the innocent are NOT mistakenly punished. Has it occurred to anyone that the reason why the Romans did that was because they believed that punishing the innocent was really evil?
...
For those "sophisticates" who sniff at this barbaric post about there "really" being evil, let me ask you this. Is the belief that there "really" is no evil itself really true, or just relatively true?
Trackback URL (right click and copy shortcut/link location)